I’m afraid that you managed to almost completely misunderstand my article. I saying that it’s a complex situation, and because it’s a complex situation, the simplistic solutions proposed by those pushing the dominant narrative, based on the wrong models, will do far more harm than good. We know this because the “solutions” being proposed have been tried before — and the Eastern Bloc were among the most polluted countries on earth. Meanwhile, it was the free market countries that actually cleaned up their act. We do have solutions, only those solutions have not be proposed by those pushing the dominant narrative, and the reject them out of hand any time anyone proposes them (like geoengineering). I don’t want to continue things as they are. That’s what those who are pushing the dominant narrative wish to do, if we are being truthful, as they reject anything other than government solutions, government regulations, government takeover — “solutions” that have only wrecked economic, social, and environmental devastation everywhere they’ve been tried. I’m actually serious about solving these problems, and that’s why I bother to try to figure out what’s actually going on rather than developing models that tell me what I want to hear and proposing solutions that do nothing but centralize power in my own hands — or blindly help others to do so. I will have no financial or political gain from getting this right, unlike every single one of those who are pushing the dominant narrative, which is no doubt why nobody will actually listen to me.